DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF FGFRs SIGNALING
PATHWAY COMPONENTS IN BLADDER CANCER:
A STEP TOWARD PERSONALIZED MEDICINE Ousati Ashtiani Z1,2, Tavakkoly-Bazzaz J2,*, Salami SA3,
Pourmand MR4, Mansouri F5,6, Mashahdi R1, Pourmand G1,* *Corresponding Author: Professor Gholamreza Pourmand, Urology Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University Medical Sciences,
Hasan Abad Square, Tehran, 113746911, Iran. Tel: +98-216-634-8560. Fax: +98-216-634-8561. Email: pourmand@tums.ac.ir and/
or Associate Professor Javad Tavakkoly-Bazzaz, Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences,
Poursina Street, Tehran, 1417613151, Iran. Tel: +98-218-895-3005. Fax: +98-218-895-3005. Email: tavakkolybazzazj@tums.ac.ir page: 75
|
RESULTS
Patient Characteristics. This study comprised 50
BC patients including 43 (86.0%) men and seven (14.0%)
women. Analyses of the subjects showed that 36 (72.0%)
cases had high-grade and 14 (28.0%) had low-grade tumors.
Their median age was 66 years (range 33-84 years).
There were 34 patients (68.0%) with a smoking habit, of
which 94.0% (32/34) had been cigarette smokers for ≥10
years and 20.0% (10/50) were opium addicts. Of these
subjects, 16.0% (8/50) had diabetes and 46.0% (23/50)
showed cardiovascular and/or respiratory diseases. The
rate of occupational exposure was about 54.0% (27/50).
Table 2 shows the demographic and clinicopathological
characteristics of all subjects.
Increased mRNA expression of FGFR3 was observed
in 92.0% (46/50) of tumors. Analysis by a multi variable
regression method with a stepwise selection variable demonstrated
that there was significant association between increased expression of FGFR3 and cigarette smoking (p
= 0.037) and family history of cancer (p = 0.004) (Table
3). We could not find a significant relationship between
FGFR3 mRNA over expression and age (p = 0.094) and
other relevant clinicopathological parameters including
stage, grade and types of the tumor. The comparison of
normalized expression in tumor and non tumor tissues
showed significant difference (fold change 5.7; p = 0.01)
(Figure 1).
Unexpectedly, FGFR1 mRNA expression in our BC
cases was decreased in 60.0% (30/50) of samples. The
majority of high grade tumor (75.0%) (27/36) reflected
a significant association with decreased level of FGFR1
mRNA expression (p = 0.047). About 64.2% (9/14) of
low-grade tumors showed increased expression of FGFR1.
There was also a significant association between normalized
expression in tumor vs. non tumor tissue (fold change
–4.5; p = 0.01) (Figure 2). Other clinicopathological parameters
did not represent any significant difference with
FGFR1 expression.
|
|
|
|
|
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|