
SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE 1 AND 2 GENE POLYMORPHISM
IN TURKISH VITILIGO PATIENTS Tuna A1, Ozturk G1, Gerceker TB1, Karaca E2,*, Onay H2, Guvenc SM2, Cogulu O2 *Corresponding Author: Emin Karaca, M.D., Associacte Professor, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Faculty
of Medicine, Ege University, Kazım Dirik mah, Izmir, Turkey. Tel: +90-232-3903961-+90-532-2579285. Fax: +90-232-
3903971. E-mail: karacaemin@gmail.com page: 67
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients. The study included 101 vitiligo patients,
with a control group of 99. The diagnosis of vitiligo was
based on clinical findings and the Wood lamp examination,
while a vitiligo-free family history, and adequate general
health, qualified probands for the control group. Types and
volumes of vitiligo in relation to the study group are summarized
in Table 1 (focal, segmental, acrofacial, generalized
universal and mixed). Other factors, such as disease
duration, family history and comorbidities including DM
or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were also noted. Written informed
consent was obtained from all subjects. The study
was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ege University
Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.
DNA Isolation and Genetic Analyses. Two milliters
of peripheral blood were extracted from each participant,
collected into EDTA tubes and stored at –20 °C. Genomic
DNA was then isolated from the peripheral blood using
standard techniques (DNA Isolation Blood Mini Kit; Invitek,
Berlin, Germany).
PCR-RFLP Analyses. For the polymorphism analysis
of SOD1 35 A/C and SOD2 A16V (C/T), polymerase
chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphim
(PCR-RFLP) was performed on both occasions. For SOD1
gene 35 A/C polymorphism, PCR was initiated using forward
(5’-CTA TCC AGA AAA CAC GGT GGG CC-3’)
and reverse (5’-TCT ATA TTC AAT CAA ATG CTA CAA
AAC-3’) primers. For SOD2 gene A16V (C/T) polymorphism,
forward (5’-AGC AGG CAG CTG GCG CCG
G-3’) and reverse (5’-GCG TTG ATG TGA GGT TCC AG-
3’) primers were used. A total volume of 25 μL, containing
50 ng DNA, 2 mM dNTPs, 2 nmol of each related primer,
1.5 mM MgCl2 and 3U Taq polymerase, was used in each
polymorphism PCR set up. Each PCR cycle consisted of
denaturation at 94 °C for 30 seconds, extension at 72 °C
for 30 seconds, and a final extension step of incubation
at 72 °C for 7 min. Annealing temperatures were 55 °C
and 59.6 °C for 30 seconds for SOD1 35 A/C and SOD2
A16V (C/T) polymorphisms, respectively.
Genotyping of the SOD1 Gene 35 A/C Polymorphism.
The 278 bp PCR products for the SOD1 gene 35
A/C polymorphism were digested using the restriction
enzyme HhaI (Fermentas, The Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Waltham, MA, USA) at 37 °C for 3 hours with 5U enzymes.
The presence of the 35C mutant allele manifested
through the appearance of sites of restriction. Following
enzyme digestion, products were then cut into two fragments
of 207 and 71 bp (Figure 1).
Genotyping of the SOD2 Gene A16V (C/T) Polymorphism.
A 267 bp amplicon of the SOD2 gene A16V
(C/T) polymorphism was digested using NgoMIV (Fermentas)
restriction endonuclease, left overnight at 37 °C.
Due to the presence of a mutant allele, the 267 bp PCR
amplification product digested into fragments of 183 and
84 bp, respectively (Figure 1). All fragments were visualized
via electrophoresis on 4.0% agarose gel after
restriction. Positive and negative controls were used in
each genotyping assay.
Sequencing of the PCR Amplified Product. As a
safeguard, Sanger sequencing of the PCR product was
used to confirm the presence of the SOD1 and SOD2 gene
sequences before continuing (Figure 2).
Statistical Analyses. The SOD1 35 A/C and SOD2
A16V (C/T) polymorphism allele frequencies of Vitiligo
patients were compared to those of a control group using the χ2 test; the application of statistical program SPSS 9.0. p
Values of <0.05 (one-way) were considered to be significant.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|