
REPORT OF A NEW CASE WITH PENTASOMY X
AND NOVEL CLINICAL FINDINGS Demirhan O, Tanriverdi N, Yilmaz MB, Kocaturk-Sel S,
Inandiklioglu N, Luleyap U, Akbal E, Comertpay G,Tufan T, Dur O *Corresponding Author: Professor Dr. Osman Demirhan, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty
of Medicine, Çukurova University, 01330 Saricam, Adana, Turkey. Tel: +90-322-338-7140. Fax: +90-322-
338-6572. E-mail: osdemir@cu.edu.tr page: 85
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Case Report. She was born by Cesarean section
during the 32nd gestational week as a result of premature
membrane rupture. The infant was a 1-yearold
girl, the fourth child of healthy related parents
(mother aged 31, father 45). Her birth weight was
unknown. Her current weight was 8000 g, length was
66 cm (25th percentile), and head circumference was
43 cm (75-90th percentile). Her siblings were healthy
and developed normally. The infant was admitted to
the inpatient clinic at the Department of Pediatrics,
Çukurova University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana,
Turkey, with a history of cough and fever for 20
days. Her physical examination revealed that she
had a body temperature of 39 °C, a pulse rate of 128
beats/min. and a blood pressure of 100/60 mm/Hg.
She had tachypnea and dyspnea with oxygen saturation
of 88.0% in room air. Auscultation of chest
revealed bilateral crepitations and the cardiovascular
examination revealed 3/6 systolic murmur. Palpable
hepatomegaly was present in the abdomen. The neurological
examination was notable for diffuse hypotonia,
tongue fasciculations and absent deep tendon
reflexes. She also had oblique eye fissures, upward
ears, thenar atrophy and normal external genitalia.
Initial laboratory tests showed a white blood cell
(WBC) count of 16.0 × 109/L with 50.0% neutrophils,
42.0% lymphocytes, 4.0% monocytes, 4.0% eosinophils,
a platelet count of 257.0 × 109/L, a red blood
cell (RBC) count of 3.7 × 1012/L, procalcitonin concentration
of 24 ng/ml, an alanine aminotransferase
(ALT) level of 21 U/L, a creatinine phospokinase
(CPK) level of 36 U/L and a creatinine concentration
of 0.41 mg/dL. Her venereal diseases research
laboratory (VDRL), cytomegalovirus, rubella, and
toxoplasma tests were negative. The pediatric cardiology
department of our hospital evaluated the patient.
Transthoracic echocardiography revealed patent
ductus arteriosus and a mild pulmonary hypertension
so the patient was treated with captopril and furosemide
drugs. The child also had pneumonia and was
given antibiotics for 10 days. The pediatric neurology
department evaluated the patient. According to
her neurological findings and physical examination,
spinal muscular atrophy was suspected, but genetic
testing could not be performed to confirm the clinical
diagnosis. The patient was discharged after 10
days of treatment. The child will regularly attend
the pediatric cardiology and neurology polyclinic
follow-up (Figure 1).
Cytogenetic Analysis. The diagnosis of the infant
was made on the basis of a chromosomal analysis
at the Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana,
Turkey. Standard cytogenetic procedures were performed
for the analysis of metaphase chromosomes
from peripheral blood samples. Standard techniques
for the cultivation of lymphocytes from peripheral
blood were used and the preparations were treated
with trypsin to obtain G-banding. The analyses were
performed on ≥50 cells. Karyotype analyses were
as per International System for Human Cytogenetic
Nomenclature (ISCN) (2005) standards.
Molecular Analysis. DNA was extracted
from blood samples of the baby and her parents
using InstaGene™ Matrix (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. Quantitative fluorescent-polymerase
chain reaction (QF-PCR) amplifications
were performed employing Aneufast™ (Molgentix
SL, Barcelona, Spain) trisomy detection kit that includes fluorescently labeled primers for the 35
predefined short tandem repeat (STR) marker sites
for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y, and primer
pairs for amelogenin (AMXY) (specific to X and Y
chromosomes) and sex-determining region Y (SRY)
(specific to Y chromosome) regions. The kit also
contains deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) and
Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase in an optimized reaction
buffer. Two μL of the DNA (5-10 ng) and 3 μL of
PCR-grade water were added to 10 μL of each of the
master mixes. After the initial denaturation at 95 °C
for 15 min., amplification was followed by 28 cycles
at 95 °C for 40 seconds, 58 °C for 80 seconds and 72
°C for 40 seconds and final extension was 30 min.
at 60 °C. The QF-PCR products (1.5 μL from each
mix) were collected in 20 μL Hi-Di™ Formamide
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) containing
0.3 μL of GeneScan™ –500 LIZ™ (Applied Biosystems) size standard. After denaturation at 95
°C for 3 min., the mixture was allowed to cool down
to 4 °C and then capillary electrophoresis was carried
out on an ABI PRISM™ 3130 Genetic Analyzer using
POP7 polymer (Applied Biosystems). Analysis
of the results and calculation of the peak areas were
performed using GeneMapper 4.0 software (Applied
Biosystems).
Origin of the Aneuploidy. The parental origin
of the aneuploidy was revealed by comparing of the
STR alleles of the baby with that of her mother and
father. The meiotic division errors that occurred either
in meiosis I or meiosis II, was inferred on the basis of
non reduction/reduction stage of the chromosome by
comparing the proximal (peri-centromeric) markers.
If parental heterozygosity was retained in the aneuploidic
child, it is concluded that the error occurred
during meiosis I, and if parental heterozygosity was
reduced to homozygosity in the child, it is concluded
that the error occurred during meiosis II or post-zygotic
mitosis. Mitotic errors were distinguished from
meiosis II by evaluating medial and distal markers.
If the individual was reduced to homozygosity at all
informative loci, including at least one each in proximal,
medial, and distal portions of the chromosome,
a post-zygotic origin was inferred. If the individual
was not reduced to homozygosity at one or more loci,
the error was assigned to meiosis II [3-6].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|