
INVESTIGATION OF FASCICULATION AND ELONGATION
PROTEIN ζ-1 (FEZ1) IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD REVEALS
DIFFERENCES IN GENE EXPRESSION IN PATIENTS
WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA Vachev TI1, Stoyanova VK, Ivanov HY, Minkov IN, Popov NT *Corresponding Author: Associate Professor Vili K. Stoyanova, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Pediatrics and
Medical Genetics, Medical University ‒ Plovdiv, 15A Vasil Aprilov St., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Tel: +359-32-
602-431; Fax: +359-32-602-593. E-mail: vi1sto@abv.bg page: 31
|
RESULTS
In order to identify whether a key DISC1 (interacting
partner gene) FEZ1 expression is altered
in SZ patients we performed a detailed analysis of
peripheral blood samples. To test this, we evaluated
FEZ1 mRNA levels in SZ patients.
As the data were normally distributed, we performed
two-tailed t-test. A statistically significant
difference of FEZ1 mRNA level was revealed (p =
0.0068) (Figure 2). Relative quantification (RQ) calculations
were done using the 2‒Ct method [16]. The
results clearly demonstrate down-regulation of FEZ1
mRNA levels in SZ patients. The data are presented as the fold change in gene expression normalized
to an endogenous reference gene and relative to the
healthy control patients (Figure 3).
The observed differences in individual expression
levels clearly demonstrate the heterogeneity in
the expression profile of the analyzed gene that is in
agreement with the results observed in inter-patient
variation in the expression studies by other authors.
The PCR amplification of the specific products corresponding
to ACTB and FEZ1 amplicons was confirmed
by monitoring the dissociation curve (Figure 4).
The Spearman test did not manage to reveal any
significant correlation with age and sex in the tested
groups (p = 0.65/p = 0.54). The ROC also displayed
good characterization of state prediction with AUC =
0.728, (p = 0.0011) (Figure 5). All this was consistent
with a key role of FEZ1 protein as interacting partner
with DISC1 as SZ susceptibility genes (Figure 1A),
and FEZ1 protein partners involved in neurogenesis as shown in Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Processes
(p = 0.063) (Figure 1B).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|