
PHENOTYPIC VARIATIONS IN WOLFHIRSCHHORN
SYNDROME Sukarova-Angelovska E, Kocova M, Sabolich V, Palcevska S, Angelkova N *Corresponding Author: Doz. Elena Sukarova-Angelovska, Pediatric Clinic, Medical Faculty, Vodnjanska 17,
1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. Tel.: +389-70358582. Fax: +389-22439301. E-mail: Esukarova@doctor.com page: 23
|
INTRODUCTION
Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a rare
chromosomal disorder due to the deletion of the short
arm of chromosome 4. The first description of the
syndrome was published by Cooper and Hirschhorn
[1] and Hirschhorn et al. [2]; it was afterwards confirmed
by Wolf et al. [3]. The syndrome occurs in approximately
1:50,000 newborns [4]. Approximately
120 cases have been described thus far using conventional
karyotyping [5]. Recently-used molecular
techniques increase the number of diagnosed cases
due to the detection of smaller deletions of the short
arm of chromosome 4 [6,7].
Common features of the syndrome include microcephaly,
characteristic facial dysmorphism, frequently
cited as a Greek helmet-like forehead, broad
forehead with prominent glabella and shallow orbital
arches; hyperthelorism, short and broad nose; short
upturned philtrum and low-set dysplastic ears. Severe
psychomotor delay is present in most cases. Seizures
usually occur within the first 2 years of life and have
variable presentation. Less frequent features are midline
defects: congenital heart defect, cleft palate, hypospadia,
as well as skeletal abnormalities, club foot,
mesomelia, radioulnar synostosis, fused vertebrae
and ribs, and hip dislocation. Growth is severely affected
[8]. The infants are born small for gestational
age. Receding of postnatal growth velocity continues
in early childhood, the height of affected children is
3SDS (standard deviation score) below the mean.
Some of the patients have a short life span, mainly because of the lower respiratory infections and multiple
anomalies. However, the children with smaller
deletions have a better survival rate [9].
Most cases are caused by a de novo deletion
of chromosome 4p, while in 20.0% of cases, translocation
in the parental karyotype that includes
chromosome 4, is responsible for the loss of the
part of chromosome 4 in the offspring [4,10,11].
Other structural rearrangements including this region,
such as inversions, are a rare cause of WHS.
Mosaic state of deletion of chromosome 4p(p15-
pter) has been described in two cases so far, and
has highly non specific clinical presentation [12,13].
Mosaicism in parental cells could be the reason
for occurrence of overt WHS in the offspring [14].
Some investigators speculate that parental imprinting
is a responsible mechanism for the phenotype,
since the majority of deleted chromosomes 4 are of
paternal origin [15].
The critical region for WHS is located on the
terminal part of the chromosome 4p, with a length of
approximately 1-5 Mbp. In rare cases the cytogenetically
visible deletion is interstitial. It has been estimated
that the minimal critical region of the deleted
region is 165 kb from the telomere and is up to 750 kb
in length, most frequently between loci FGFR3 and
D4S168 [7,16]. However, it is a gene-rich region and
produces severe clinical presentation in most cases.
In 80.0% of cases, the deletion is large, up to 4p14
[9]. The remaining 20.0% of patients have smaller
deletions, mostly on the 4p16.3 band, a presentation
called Pit-Roger-Danks syndrome [17]. This minor
deletion leads to less severe and frequently uncharacteristic
clinical presentation.
Multiple genes are responsible for the clinical
presentation. However, haploinsuficiency of the
WHSC1 gene that encodes a DNA binding protein, is
mostly believed to be a cause for the pleiotropic effects.
The WHSC1 gene is responsible for chromatin
remodeling, and therefore causes insufficient regulation
of many genes [18]. Zolino et al. [10] suggested
that other genes outside the critical region contributed
to the phenotype. An additional gene within
the WHS critical region, LETM1, involved in Ca
binding signaling, is responsible for the seizures in
these patients [4,10,]. The gene has been located at the
proximal side of the Wolf-Hirschhorn critical region
(WHCR) and has an influence on the mitochondrial
ion homeostasis [19].
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|