
HUMAN RING CHROMOSOMES – NEW INSIGHTS
FOR THEIR CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Guilherme RS1,2, Klein E1, Hamid AB1, Bhatt S1, Volleth M3, Polityko A4, Kulpanovich
A5, Dufke A6, Albrecht B7, Morlot S8, Brecevic L9, Petersen MB10, Manolakos E10,
Kosyakova N1, Liehr T1* *Corresponding Author: Thomas Liehr, Institut für Humangenetik, Kollegiengasse 10, Postfach D-07740
Jena, Germany; Tel.: +49-3641-935533; Fax: +49-3641-935582; E-mail: i8lith@mti.uni-jena.de page: 13
|
INTRODUCTION
It is common sense that ring chromosomes result
from two terminal breaks on both chromosome
arms followed by fusion of the broken ends, leading
to the loss of genetic material. Alternatively, they
can be formed by telomere-telomere fusion without
deletion [1] or the so-called McClintock mechanism
[2]. Also more complex mechanisms of ring chromosome
formation have been proposed [3,4]. Ring
chromosomes are also observed as small supernumerary
marker chromosomes (sSMC) [5,6], however,
their formation seems to be completely different
from that of ring chromosomes in a numerically
normal karyotype [7,8].
Phenotypes associated with ring chromosomes
can be highly variable, since in addition to the primary
deletion associated with ring formation, secondary
loss or gain of material may occur due to ring chromosome instability. It has also been reported
that the phenotype of ring chromosome patients
can overlap that of the deletion of both ends of the
respective chromosome syndromes without ring
formation. Moreover, there have also been numerous
reports on ring chromosomes without clinical
consequences, apart from possible infertility, if no
relevant genetic material was lost due to ring chromosome
formation [1]. Here we report ring chromosomes
observed in 29 patients with (severe) clinical
problems, and/or solely infertility, evaluated by
cytogenetic and molecular techniques.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|