INTEGRATED GENOMIC ANALYSIS OF BREAST CANCERS
Addou-Klouche L1,2, Adélaïde1 J, Cornen S1, Bekhouche I1, Finetti P1, Guille A1, Sircoulomb F1, Raynaud S1, Bertucci F1,3,4, Birnbaum D1, Chaffanet M1,*
*Corresponding Author: Max Chaffanet, Ph.D., HDR, Department of Molecular Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Tel.: +33-(0)4-91-22-34-77; Fax: +33- (0)4-91-22-35-44; E-mail: CHAFFANETM@ipc.unicancer.fr
page: 71

INTRODUCTION

High-Throughput Molecular Analyses in Breast Cancer and Translational Research. Unprecedented molecular characterization is possible using high-throughput molecular analyses, available at the DNA level with comparative genomic hybridization on microarrays (aCGH) [1-4], and at the RNA level, for expression profiling with DNA microarrays [5]. When these techniques emerged, expected applications were multiple in oncology, in both basic and translational research. A number of studies have already shown the promising role of DNA microarray-based expression profiling in breast cancer translational research by identifying new clinically and biologically relevant intrinsic molecular subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, ERBB2+, basal, and normal-like) [6-7] and new prognostic and/or predictive gene signatures, whose predictive impact is superior to conventional histoclinical factors (for review, see [8]). Currently, three prognostic gene signatures are already commercially available: Oncotype DX (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA), MammaPrint (Agendia BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), and the HOXB13/ IL17BR (H/I) ratio (Theros H/ISM; bioTheranostics, San Diego, CA, USA). Others under development include the Intrinsic Gene Set, the Rotterdam Signature, the Wound Response Indicator, and the Invasive Gene Signature. Similarly, signatures predictive for response to specific therapies have been reported [9-12]. These prognostic or predictive signatures, once prospectively validated, will provide the opportunity to refine our therapeutic approach by individualizing treatment to patients’individual tumor profiles, likely contributing to significantly improve the clinical outcome (for review, see [13]). The aCGH technology has been applied more recently to breast cancer. To date, some studies, including ours, have suggested a prognostic role of genomic data [14-16]. The integrative analysis of whole-genome expression and genomic data has revealed promising results for identifying candidate genes (identified as deregulated at the DNA and RNA levels simultaneously) associated with breast cancer or with specific features of disease [14,16-24]. For years, our laboratory has identified a large number of molecular alterations in recurrent breast cancer associated with: i) structural aberrations such as breakages [25-29], and ii) evaluated the clinical impact of the amplification [14,30,31]. We were among the first to demonstrate that the integrative analysis of whole-genome expression and genomic high resolution data are useful to identify new oncogenes and TSG specific to a clinical entity or a molecular subtype. Therefore, our comparative analyses of integrated profiles of breast cancers have been reported in basal and luminal tumors, two molecular subtypes of very different clinical courses [19], but also in particularly aggressive cancer: inflammatory breast cancer [32], breast cancers in young women (Raynaud et al., in preparation), and ERBB2 amplified breast cancers [33]. This laboratory was also one of the first to identify specific genomic markers of luminal B: L3MBTL4 (18p11) [34] and ZNF703 (8p12) [35] as potential TSG and oncogene, respectively. Candidate Genes May Also be Transcriptionnally Deregulated Because of Epigenetic Alterations. The widespread deregulation of basic epigenetic profiles has emerged as a common phenotypic trait of cancer cells [36-38]. The epigenetic modifications include covalent tags added to nucleosome histone components [e.g., acetylation of histone H3 and/or H4 (H3/4Ac) and/or various levels of methylation on lysine residues of histone H3 (H3K4/ K9me1/ 2/3), a non exhaustive list defined as the histone code], as well as methylation of CpG dinucleotides [39,40]. This applies particularly to CpG methylation profiles, whose modification has direct implication on many aspects of cell biology, namely cell division, survival, development and, consequently, oncogenesis. DNA methylation at regulatory regions of a gene, including promoter, generally leads to transcriptional silencing. CpG methylation-dependent silencing is now considered as an important mechanism of TSG inactivation in cancer cells, in addition to somatic genetic lesions [41]. DNA methylation changes in human cancers are complex and vary between different tumor types. Promoter methylation effectively represses transcription and occurs in many genes involved in human breast cancer development [42]. Among these, genes associated with cell cycle regulation (APC, RASSF1, RB, TFAP2A), or coding for steroid receptors (ESR1, PGR, RARa), suppressors (BRCA1, CDKN2A, CST6), and genes associated with metastasis (CDH1, CEACAM6, PCDHGB6) and other genes such as NRG1. The majority of these affected genes are potential or known TSG [43]. Interestingly, there is also increasing evidence that methylation of regulatory regions of cancer-related genes can be one of the most prevalent molecular markers for human cancer diseases [44]. The potential clinical applications of DNAmethylation biomarkers may include diagnosis of neoplasm, tumor classification, prediction of response to treatment, or prognosis. DNA methylation status has thus been extensively studied in various molecular or clinical entities in breast cancers in order to better characterize them or improve their molecular classification [45-49]. In the continuity of our strategy, the high resolution DNA promoter methylation status will be analyzed on human promoter array (Agilent Technologies, Massy, France) and integrated to the genomic and gene expression data previously collected in the same set of 300 breast tumors. Highthroughput molecular analyses of breast cancer have already revealed some part of their potential. Such integrated approaches could contribute to better understand the various levels of the dynamic molecular changes in the mammary oncogenesis and identify new markers.



Number 27
VOL. 27 (2), 2024
Number 27
VOL. 27 (1), 2024
Number 26
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one
Number 26
VOL. 26(2), 2023
Number 26
VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement
Number 26
VOL. 26(1), 2023
Number 25
VOL. 25(2), 2022
Number 25
VOL. 25 (1), 2022
Number 24
VOL. 24(2), 2021
Number 24
VOL. 24(1), 2021
Number 23
VOL. 23(2), 2020
Number 22
VOL. 22(2), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22(1), 2019
Number 22
VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement
Number 21
VOL. 21(2), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21 (1), 2018
Number 21
VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement
Number 20
VOL. 20 (2), 2017
Number 20
VOL. 20 (1), 2017
Number 19
VOL. 19 (2), 2016
Number 19
VOL. 19 (1), 2016
Number 18
VOL. 18 (2), 2015
Number 18
VOL. 18 (1), 2015
Number 17
VOL. 17 (2), 2014
Number 17
VOL. 17 (1), 2014
Number 16
VOL. 16 (2), 2013
Number 16
VOL. 16 (1), 2013
Number 15
VOL. 15 (2), 2012
Number 15
VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement
Number 15
Vol. 15 (1), 2012
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011
Number 14
The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics
Number 14
14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011
Number 13
Vol. 13 (2), 2010
Number 13
Vol.13 (1), 2010
Number 12
Vol.12 (2), 2009
Number 12
Vol.12 (1), 2009
Number 11
Vol.11 (2),2008
Number 11
Vol.11 (1),2008
Number 10
Vol.10 (2), 2007
Number 10
10 (1),2007
Number 9
1&2, 2006
Number 9
3&4, 2006
Number 8
1&2, 2005
Number 8
3&4, 2004
Number 7
1&2, 2004
Number 6
3&4, 2003
Number 6
1&2, 2003
Number 5
3&4, 2002
Number 5
1&2, 2002
Number 4
Vol.3 (4), 2000
Number 4
Vol.2 (4), 1999
Number 4
Vol.1 (4), 1998
Number 4
3&4, 2001
Number 4
1&2, 2001
Number 3
Vol.3 (3), 2000
Number 3
Vol.2 (3), 1999
Number 3
Vol.1 (3), 1998
Number 2
Vol.3(2), 2000
Number 2
Vol.1 (2), 1998
Number 2
Vol.2 (2), 1999
Number 1
Vol.3 (1), 2000
Number 1
Vol.2 (1), 1999
Number 1
Vol.1 (1), 1998

 

 


 About the journal ::: Editorial ::: Subscription ::: Information for authors ::: Contact
 Copyright © Balkan Journal of Medical Genetics 2006