
INTEGRATED GENOMIC ANALYSIS OF BREAST CANCERS Addou-Klouche L1,2, Adélaïde1 J, Cornen S1, Bekhouche I1, Finetti P1, Guille A1,
Sircoulomb F1, Raynaud S1, Bertucci F1,3,4, Birnbaum D1, Chaffanet M1,* *Corresponding Author: Max Chaffanet, Ph.D., HDR, Department of Molecular Oncology, Institut Paoli
Calmettes, 232 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France; Tel.: +33-(0)4-91-22-34-77; Fax: +33-
(0)4-91-22-35-44; E-mail: CHAFFANETM@ipc.unicancer.fr page: 71
|
INTRODUCTION
High-Throughput Molecular Analyses in
Breast Cancer and Translational Research.
Unprecedented molecular characterization is possible
using high-throughput molecular analyses, available
at the DNA level with comparative genomic
hybridization on microarrays (aCGH) [1-4], and at
the RNA level, for expression profiling with DNA
microarrays [5]. When these techniques emerged,
expected applications were multiple in oncology, in
both basic and translational research.
A number of studies have already shown the
promising role of DNA microarray-based expression
profiling in breast cancer translational research
by identifying new clinically and biologically
relevant intrinsic molecular subtypes (luminal
A, luminal B, ERBB2+, basal, and normal-like)
[6-7] and new prognostic and/or predictive gene
signatures, whose predictive impact is superior to
conventional histoclinical factors (for review, see
[8]). Currently, three prognostic gene signatures
are already commercially available: Oncotype
DX (Genomic Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA,
USA), MammaPrint (Agendia BV, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands), and the HOXB13/ IL17BR (H/I)
ratio (Theros H/ISM; bioTheranostics, San Diego,
CA, USA). Others under development include the
Intrinsic Gene Set, the Rotterdam Signature, the
Wound Response Indicator, and the Invasive Gene
Signature. Similarly, signatures predictive for response
to specific therapies have been reported
[9-12]. These prognostic or predictive signatures,
once prospectively validated, will provide the opportunity
to refine our therapeutic approach by individualizing
treatment to patients’individual tumor
profiles, likely contributing to significantly improve
the clinical outcome (for review, see [13]).
The aCGH technology has been applied more
recently to breast cancer. To date, some studies, including
ours, have suggested a prognostic role of
genomic data [14-16]. The integrative analysis of
whole-genome expression and genomic data has
revealed promising results for identifying candidate
genes (identified as deregulated at the DNA and RNA
levels simultaneously) associated with breast cancer
or with specific features of disease [14,16-24].
For years, our laboratory has identified a large
number of molecular alterations in recurrent breast cancer associated with: i) structural aberrations such
as breakages [25-29], and ii) evaluated the clinical
impact of the amplification [14,30,31]. We were
among the first to demonstrate that the integrative
analysis of whole-genome expression and genomic
high resolution data are useful to identify new oncogenes
and TSG specific to a clinical entity or a molecular
subtype. Therefore, our comparative analyses
of integrated profiles of breast cancers have been
reported in basal and luminal tumors, two molecular
subtypes of very different clinical courses [19], but
also in particularly aggressive cancer: inflammatory
breast cancer [32], breast cancers in young women
(Raynaud et al., in preparation), and ERBB2 amplified
breast cancers [33]. This laboratory was also
one of the first to identify specific genomic markers
of luminal B: L3MBTL4 (18p11) [34] and ZNF703
(8p12) [35] as potential TSG and oncogene, respectively.
Candidate Genes May Also be Transcriptionnally
Deregulated Because of Epigenetic Alterations.
The widespread deregulation of basic epigenetic
profiles has emerged as a common phenotypic
trait of cancer cells [36-38]. The epigenetic modifications
include covalent tags added to nucleosome
histone components [e.g., acetylation of histone H3
and/or H4 (H3/4Ac) and/or various levels of methylation
on lysine residues of histone H3 (H3K4/
K9me1/ 2/3), a non exhaustive list defined as the
histone code], as well as methylation of CpG dinucleotides
[39,40]. This applies particularly to
CpG methylation profiles, whose modification has
direct implication on many aspects of cell biology,
namely cell division, survival, development and,
consequently, oncogenesis. DNA methylation at
regulatory regions of a gene, including promoter,
generally leads to transcriptional silencing. CpG
methylation-dependent silencing is now considered
as an important mechanism of TSG inactivation in
cancer cells, in addition to somatic genetic lesions
[41]. DNA methylation changes in human cancers
are complex and vary between different tumor
types. Promoter methylation effectively represses
transcription and occurs in many genes involved
in human breast cancer development [42]. Among
these, genes associated with cell cycle regulation
(APC, RASSF1, RB, TFAP2A), or coding for steroid
receptors (ESR1, PGR, RARa), suppressors
(BRCA1, CDKN2A, CST6), and genes associated with metastasis (CDH1, CEACAM6, PCDHGB6)
and other genes such as NRG1. The majority of
these affected genes are potential or known TSG
[43]. Interestingly, there is also increasing evidence
that methylation of regulatory regions of
cancer-related genes can be one of the most prevalent
molecular markers for human cancer diseases
[44]. The potential clinical applications of DNAmethylation
biomarkers may include diagnosis
of neoplasm, tumor classification, prediction of
response to treatment, or prognosis. DNA methylation
status has thus been extensively studied
in various molecular or clinical entities in breast
cancers in order to better characterize them or improve
their molecular classification [45-49].
In the continuity of our strategy, the high resolution
DNA promoter methylation status will
be analyzed on human promoter array (Agilent
Technologies, Massy, France) and integrated to the
genomic and gene expression data previously collected
in the same set of 300 breast tumors. Highthroughput
molecular analyses of breast cancer
have already revealed some part of their potential.
Such integrated approaches could contribute to better
understand the various levels of the dynamic
molecular changes in the mammary oncogenesis
and identify new markers.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|