
APLASIA RAS HOMOLOGOUS MEMBER I GENE
AND DEVELOPMENT OF GLIAL TUMORS Yakut S1, Tuncer MR2,* Berker M3, Goksu E2, Gurer I4, Ozes ON1, Luleci G1, Karauzum SB1 *Corresponding Author: Sibel Berker Karauzum, Department of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty
of Medicine, Akdeniz University Antalya, Turkey; Tel.: +90 242 2496971; Fax: +90 242 2274482; E-mail:
sibelkarauzum@akdeniz.edu.tr page: 37
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials. This study involved 21 primary
tumors consisting of 13 glioblastoma multiforme
(GBM), WHO grade IV; five oligodendrogliomas
(O), WHO grade III and two anaplastic astrocytomas
(AA), WHO grade III and one anaplastic oligoastrocytoma
(AOA), WHO grade III. The age range of the
patients (13 male, eight female) were 21-72 years old.
Primary tumor tissues were obtained from patients
who underwent surgery, subtotal (seven patients) and
gross total (14 patients) with their informed consent.
For LOH analysis, peripheral blood samples from 21
normal healthy volunteers was also involved. We used
RNA samples from normal brain tissues of the seven
autopsies with their relatives’ informed consent as reference
tissue for mRNA expression analyses.
DNA and RNA Extraction. DNA was isolated
from tumor tissue using the salting-out method [15].
Control DNA samples were prepared from peripheral
blood lymphocytes of the same cases for LOH analyses.
RNA was extracted from tumors and normal brain
tissue samples using the SV Total RNA Isolation Kit
(Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the manufacturer’s
protocol.
Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-
Polymerase Chain Reaction. Reverse transcription of
total RNA was performed using TaqMan Reverse Transcription
Reagents (Cat. N8080234; Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized
from 2 μg of RNA using random hexamer and Super-
Script II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Corporation,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. The amplification comprised one cycle at
25°C for 10 min. and one cycle at 48°C for 60 min.
Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using two
gene-specific primers (ARHI, 5’-TCT CTC CGA GCA
GCG CA-3’ and ARHI, 5’-TGG CAG CAG GAG
ACC CC-3’), a labeled probe (5’-TGT CTT CTA GGC
TGC TTG GTT CGT GCC-3’) (5’-FAM; 3’-TAMRA)
(9), 2 μL of reverse transcriptase reaction mixture and
12.5 μL of Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on an
ABI PRIMS™ 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied
Biosystems), according to the manufacturer’s
protocol. Ribosomal RNA was amplified in the same
reaction. Both the rRNA primers and probes were obtained
from PE Applied Biosystems (Cat. 4308329).
Amplification used a touch-down PCR protocol beginning
with 94°C for 5 min., followed by seven cycles at
95°C for 45 seconds, annealing temperatures starting
at 62°C for 45 seconds (decreasing by 1°C/cycle) and
72°C for 90 seconds for extension. This step was followed
by 40 cycles at 95°C for 45 seconds, 55°C for
45 seconds, 72°C for 90 seconds and a final extension
at 72°C for 10 min. The expression level of the tumors
was calculated by normalizing that of ARHI to that of
the rRNA. Tumors that showed a lower ARHI level
than normal brain tissue were interpreted as decreased.
Expression results were analyzed by the comparative
threshold cycle (ΔΔCt) method according to the User
Bulletin No. 2 (Applied Biosystems). All experiments
were performed in duplicate.
BisulfiteTreatment and Combined Bisulfite
Restriction Analysis. Twenty-one glial brain tumor
samples were evaluated for loss of functional allele
resulting from allele-specific methylation of CpG is land I, II and III. Bisulfite treatment of DNA was performed
according to a modified standard protocol. The
COBRA was performed as described in [16]. DNA
from lymphocytes of a healthy volunteer was treated
with Sss1 methyltransferase (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA, USA), then subjected to bisulfite treatment
as a positive control. After cleaning the modified
DNAs using the GeneClean III Kit (Bio 101 system;
Q-Biogen, Vista, CA, USA), 1 μL (100 ng/ml) DNA
was amplified in 50 μL reaction mixtures containing
5 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 3 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 1.5
μL of 40 mM dNTPs, 2.5 μL of each primer (10 pmol/
μL) and 0.2 μL (2 U/μL) of Platinum AmpliTaq Gold
DNA polymerase (Invitrogen). Primers were designed
based on the nucleotide sequence of the ARHI gene
submitted to GenBank (AF202543). Primers used for
COBRA were: CpGI-F/R, 5’-GTA AGG GAG AAA
GAA GTT AGA-3’/5’-TAC TAT CCT AAC AAA
ACC CTC-3’; CpGII-F/R, 5’-GTT GGG TTA GTT
TTT TAT AGT TGG TT-3’/5’-AAC CAA ACA ACC
TAA AAA ACA AAT AC-3’; CpGIII-F/R, 5’-GTT
TTT AAG TTT TAT AGG AAG ATT-3’/5’-ATA ATA
TAC AAA AAA AAC ACA CC-3’. Amplification
used 94°C for 5 min.; 35 cycles at 94°C for 50 seconds,
57°C for 1 min. (for CpG II); 60°C for 1 min.
(for CpG I and III) and 72°C for 50 seconds and with a
final extension at 72°C for 7 min. After amplification,
the PCR products were digested with restriction enzyme
TagI (New England Biolabs) for CpG I and BstUI
(New England Biolabs) for CpG II and III, (both
enzymes recognize and cut methylated DNA). DNA
samples were fractionated using 8.0% polyacrylamide
gel. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide
and the intensity of methylated alleles was calculated
using DigiDoc 1000 software (Alpha Innotech, San
Leandro, CA, USA). Results above 75.0% and 35.0-
74.0% were interpreted as hypermethylation and partial
methylation, respectively.
Loss of Heterozygosity Analysis. To study the
allelic deletion at chromosome 1p31, the five highly
polymorphic microsatellite markers D1S226, D1S488,
D1S430, D1S207 and D1S2638 (http://www.gdb.org)
were used. Primers for detection of LOH were as follows:
D1S226-F/R, 5’-6-FAM-GCT AGT CAG GCA
TGA GCG-3’/5’-6-FAM-GGT CAC TTG ACA TTC
GTG G-3’; D1S488-F/R,5’-6-FAM-GCA AAA CAG
AGA CTT CAC CT-3’/5’-6-FAM-CTT CCA GGG
ACT AGA ATG G-3’; D1S430-F/R, 5’-6-FAM-TCC
AGA TTT AGT GTC ATT TCC C-3’/5’-6-FAM-CAC
TTA CAG TAA CAA GCC CCA G-3’; D1S207-F/R,
5’-6-FAM-CAC TTC TCC TTG AAT CGC TT-3-
’/5’-6-FAM-GCA AGT CCT GTT CCA AGT CT-3’;
D1S2638-F/R, 5’-6-FAM-CTT GGA TTG GTG GGT
ACT A-3’/5’-6-FAM-AGG TTT CAG GGT GGC T-3’.
The PCR used 100 ng/mL of DNA in a 25 μL reaction
mixture that contained 2.5 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 0.2
μL of 5 U/μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen),
3 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 1.5 μL of 20 mM dNTPs and
1.5 μL of 10 pmol/μL of the primers mentioned above.
Amplification used: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5
min.; 32 cycles at 94°C for 45 seconds, 50°C for 45
seconds and 72°C for 1 min. and with a final extension
at 72°C for 7 min. for markers D1S226, D1S488,
D1S207, D1S2638. For the D1S430 marker: initial denaturation
at 94°C for 5 min.; 32 cycles at 94°C for 45
seconds, 55°C for 45 seconds and 72°C for 1 min. with
a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products
were diluted 30-fold, then 1.5 μL was added to 23.5 μL
formamide with 0.5 μL Genescan™ 500 LIZ TM size
standards (Applied Biosystems). DNA fragments were
separated by capillary electrophoresis and the signals
were detected with DNA sequencer 310 (Applied Biosystems,
Perkin-Elmer Corporation) The results were
analyzed by Genescan collection and analysis software
(Applied Biosystems, Perkin-Elmer Corporation).
Scoring of LOH was performed by Genescan output.
If the ratio of the normal and tumor DNA peak heights
were ≤0.5 and ≥1.5, it was intrepeted as LOH of the
long allele and of the small allele, respectively. The
presence of LOH was calculated with a formula mentioned
below.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|