
DROPLET DIGITAL PCR AS A MOLECULAR TOOL FOR THE DETECTION OF THE EGFR T790M MUTATION IN NSCLC PATIENTS WITH THE EGFR ACTIVATING MUTATIONS Durgut S, Salihefendić L, Pećar D, Čeko I, Mulahuseinović N, Izmirlija M, Konjhodžić R *Corresponding Author: Selma Durgut, MD, ALEA Genetic Center, Olovska 67, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina; Mob.: +38761904549, Email: selma.durgut@agc.ba page: 21 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
Background
Almost 50% of NSCLC patients who initially show a
successful response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeted
therapy (TKI therapy) eventually develop acquired EGFR
T790M mutation. The T790M secondary mutation can
cause resistance to the targeted therapy and disease relapse.
Since this mutation can be present at very low frequencies
in liquid biopsy samples, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR),
due to its high sensitivity, has opened the possibility for
minimally invasive monitoring of the disease during TKI
targeted therapy.
Materials and methods
For this study, a total of 45 plasma samples from
NSCLC patients with previously detected EGFR-activating mutations were analyzed. Extracted circulating free
DNA was amplified and examined for the presence of
T790M mutation using ddPCR technology. For the data
analysis, QuantaSoft Software was used.
Results
Of 45 tested plasma samples, a total of 14 samples
were identified as positive for the T790M mutation. The
same samples eventually showed the presence of T790M
mutation in FFPE. Droplet digital PCR showed its great
advantage in high sensitivity detection of rare allele variants. Our ddPCR assay detected T790M mutant allele in
frequencies from 0.1%. The average number of droplets
generated by ddPCR was 9571.
Conclusion
Monitoring of the T790M mutation has an important
role in the examination of the effects of the prescribed TKI
therapy. Since monitoring of potential changes during TKI
therapy requires repeated sampling, our results showed
that ddPCR technology has made it possible to use liquid
biopsy as an adequate minimally invasive alternative for
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) detection.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|