
EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR MUTATION
STATUS AND THE IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES
IN PATIENTS WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER Huang HM1, Wei Y1, Wang JJ1, Ran FY1, Wen Y2, Chen QH3, Zhang BF1,* *Corresponding Author: Dr. Bingfei Zhang, Sinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University
of Medicine, No. 16 Daling Road, 442008, Shiyan, Hubei, China. Tel.: + 86-29-8272597,
Email: dfzyysszx@163.com page: 29 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation
status differs according to ethnicity, gender, smoking history,
and histology types. The present study aimed to evaluate
EGFR mutation status in patients with non-small cell
lung cancer (NSCLC) and further explore its association
with clinical characteristics and prognosis in advanced
NSCLC patients (Stage IIIB-IV). 238 NSCLC patients
were enrolled in this study from October 2016 through
December 2019. Patient characteristics and clinical data
including age, gender, smoking history, histology types,
tumor stage, survival status, and time were collected via
electronic medical record system or telephone. 21 somatic
mutations which spanned exons 18-21 of EGFR
were detected using the amplification refractory mutation
system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) method,
followed by analysis of links to clinical characteristics,
progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
103 patients were detected harboring EGFR mutations
among the 238 cases tested (43.3%), and exons 19 and
21 were the highest mutation frequencies, with 20.6% and
19.3% respectively. The EGFR mutation rate was much
higher in female versus male (57.4% vs 31.5%, p <0.001),
in non-smokers compared to smokers (56.8% vs 25.9%,
p <0.001), and in those with adenocarcinoma than other
histology types (48.3% vs 3.7%, p <0.001). For patients
in advanced stage, median PFS was 11 months in patients
harboring EGFR mutations, versus 4 months in patients
with wild type EGFR (p <0.001); median OS was 24 versus
12 months (p <0.001). Never smoking (p = 0.042) and
adenocarcinoma (p = 0.007) were independent favorable
factors for EGFR mutations. Our data strengthen the
findings of high prevalence of EGFR mutations in Asian
patients with NSCLC. Mutations are prevalent in those
patients who are female, adenocarcinoma, and have never
smoked. Moreover, advanced EGFR mutation-positive
patients have better PFS and OS than those with wild
type EGFR.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|