
A NOVEL VARIANT IN THE LIPA GENE
ASSOCIATED WITH DISTINCT PHENOTYPE Sarajlija A.1,6, Armengol L.2, Maver A.3, Kitic I.4,6, Prokic D.4,6, Cehic M.1, Djuricic M.S.5,7, Peterlin B.3 *Corresponding Author: Adrijan Sarajlija, MD, PhD, Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia
“Dr. Vukan Cupic”, School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Radoja Dakica 6-8, Belgrade, 11070,
Serbia, Tel: +381113108287, E-mail: adrijans2004@yahoo.com page: 8 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
Deficiency of lysosomal acid lipase (LAL-D) is
caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the LIPA gene.
Spectrum of LAL-D ranges from early onset of hepatosplenomegaly
and psychomotor regression (Wolman
disease) to a more chronic course (cholesteryl ester storage
disease - CESD). The diagnosis is based on lipid and
biomarker profiles, specific liver histopathology, enzyme
deficiency, and identification of causative genetic variants.
Biomarker findings are a useful for diagnostics of LALD,
including high plasma concentration of chitotriosidase
as well as elevated oxysterols. Current treatment options
include enzyme replacement therapy (sebelipase-alpha),
statins, liver transplantation, and stem cell transplantation.
We present two pairs of siblings from Serbia with
a distinctive phenotype resembling LAL-D with a novel
variant of unknown significance (VUS) detected in the
LIPA gene and residual LAL activity. All patients presented
with hepatosplenomegaly at early childhood. In
siblings from family 1, compound heterozygosity for a
pathogenic c.419G>A (p.Trp140Ter) variant and a novel
VUS c.851C>T (p.Ser284Phe) was detected. Patients from
family 2 were homozygous for c.851C>T VUS and both
have typical histopathologic findings for LAL-D in the
liver. Enzyme activity of LAL was tested in three patients
and reported as sufficient, and therefore enzyme replacement
therapy could not be approved.
When confronted with a challenge of diagnosing an
inherited metabolic disorder, several aspects are taken into
consideration: clinical manifestations, specific biomarkers,
enzyme assay results, and molecular genetic findings.
This report brings cases to light which have a considerable
discrepancy between those aspects, namely the preserved
LAL enzyme activity in presence of clinical manifestations
and rare variants in the LIPA gene.
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|
|