
TWO YEARS OF NEWBORN SCREENING FOR CYSTIC
FIBROSIS IN NORTH MACEDONIA: FIRST EXPERIENCE Fustik S1,*, Anastasovska V2, Plaseska-Karanfilska D3, Stamatova A1,
Spirevska L1, Pesevska M2, Terzikj M3, Vujovic M3 *Corresponding Author: Professor Stojka Fustik, M.D., Ph.D., Department for Cystic Fibrosis,
University Clinic for Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius,” Vodnjanska
17, 1000 Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia. Tel.: +389-23-147-716; +389-75-705-369. Fax: +389-
23-129-027. E-mail: stojkaf@yahoo.com page: 41 download article in pdf format
|
Abstract
There is a widely accepted consensus on the benefits
of newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) in
terms of reduced disease severity, improved quality of
life, lower treatment burden, and reduced costs. More
and more countries in the world are introducing NBS for
CF as a national preventive health program. Newborn
screening for CF was introduced in the Republic of North
Macedonia (RNM) in April, 2019, after a pilot study of
6 months in 2018. A two-step immunoreactive trysinogen
(IRT-IRT) algorithm is performed, and then a sweat
test for confirmation/exclusion of the CF diagnosis when
the IRT values were both over the cutoff (70.0 and 45.0
ng/mL, respectively). In cases with confirmed diagnosis
of CF (a sweat chloride concentration >60.0 mmol/L)
or with intermediate sweat test results (a sweat chloride
concentration of between 30.0 and 59.0 mmol/L), CF
transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation
analysis is performed. By the end of 2020, over a
period of 27 months, including the pilot study period, a
total number of 43,139 newborns were screened for CF.
Seventeen (0.039%) newborns were diagnosed with CF. In
all newly discovered CF cases by screening, the diagnosis
was confirmed by determination of the CFTR mutations.
The most common CFTR mutation, F508del, was found
with an overall incidence of 70.6%. Other more frequent
mutations were G542X (11.8%) and N1303K (5.9%). Four
mutations were found in one CFTR allele each: G1349D,
G126D, 457TAT>G and CFTRdupexon22, with the last
one being newly discovered with unknown consequences.
An incredibly large difference was found in the incidence
of the disease between the Macedonian and Albanian neonatal
population, with almost four time higher prevalence
among Albanians (1:4530 vs. 1:1284).
|
|
|
|



 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (2), 2024 |
Number 27 VOL. 27 (1), 2024 |
Number 26 Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 All in one |
Number 26 VOL. 26(2), 2023 |
Number 26 VOL. 26, 2023 Supplement |
Number 26 VOL. 26(1), 2023 |
Number 25 VOL. 25(2), 2022 |
Number 25 VOL. 25 (1), 2022 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(2), 2021 |
Number 24 VOL. 24(1), 2021 |
Number 23 VOL. 23(2), 2020 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(2), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22(1), 2019 |
Number 22 VOL. 22, 2019 Supplement |
Number 21 VOL. 21(2), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21 (1), 2018 |
Number 21 VOL. 21, 2018 Supplement |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (2), 2017 |
Number 20 VOL. 20 (1), 2017 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (2), 2016 |
Number 19 VOL. 19 (1), 2016 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (2), 2015 |
Number 18 VOL. 18 (1), 2015 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (2), 2014 |
Number 17 VOL. 17 (1), 2014 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (2), 2013 |
Number 16 VOL. 16 (1), 2013 |
Number 15 VOL. 15 (2), 2012 |
Number 15 VOL. 15, 2012 Supplement |
Number 15 Vol. 15 (1), 2012 |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (2), 2011 |
Number 14 The 9th Balkan Congress of Medical Genetics |
Number 14 14 - Vol. 14 (1), 2011 |
Number 13 Vol. 13 (2), 2010 |
Number 13 Vol.13 (1), 2010 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (2), 2009 |
Number 12 Vol.12 (1), 2009 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (2),2008 |
Number 11 Vol.11 (1),2008 |
Number 10 Vol.10 (2), 2007 |
Number 10 10 (1),2007 |
Number 9 1&2, 2006 |
Number 9 3&4, 2006 |
Number 8 1&2, 2005 |
Number 8 3&4, 2004 |
Number 7 1&2, 2004 |
Number 6 3&4, 2003 |
Number 6 1&2, 2003 |
Number 5 3&4, 2002 |
Number 5 1&2, 2002 |
Number 4 Vol.3 (4), 2000 |
Number 4 Vol.2 (4), 1999 |
Number 4 Vol.1 (4), 1998 |
Number 4 3&4, 2001 |
Number 4 1&2, 2001 |
Number 3 Vol.3 (3), 2000 |
Number 3 Vol.2 (3), 1999 |
Number 3 Vol.1 (3), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.3(2), 2000 |
Number 2 Vol.1 (2), 1998 |
Number 2 Vol.2 (2), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.3 (1), 2000 |
Number 1 Vol.2 (1), 1999 |
Number 1 Vol.1 (1), 1998 |
|
|